Denis O. Lamoureux- coming out of the Closet


Denis O. Lamoureux supported neo Darwinism for decades. Neo Darwinism is a modern synthesis of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution with Mendelian genetics. It is the most widely accepted explanation for the diversity of life on Earth. Lamoureux is a professor of science and religion at the University of Alberta, and he has written extensively on the relationship between science and religion. He argues that neodarwinism is compatible with Christian faith, and he has developed a model of evolutionary creationism that integrates the two.

Lamoureux's model of evolutionary creationism is based on the idea that God created the universe and life through an ordained, sustained, and design-reflecting evolutionary process. He argues that this model is consistent with the Bible, and that it provides a more accurate and complete understanding of the origins of life than either young-Earth creationism or old-Earth creationism.

Lamoureux's work has been praised by some scientists and religious scholars, but it has also been criticized by others. Some critics argue that his model of evolutionary creationism is not supported by the evidence, while others argue that it is not compatible with Christian faith.

Lamoureux has written extensively on the relationship between Darwinian evolution and Christianity. Some of his most notable writings include:

  • I Love Jesus & I Accept Evolution (2008)

  • Darwinism Defeated? (1999)

  • Struggling with God & Origins: A Personal Story (2007)

  • Evolution: Scripture and Nature Say Yes (2013)

  • The Bible & Ancient Science: Principles of Interpretation (2016)

In these books, Lamoureux argues that there is no conflict between Darwin and Christianity. 

Here are some specific passages from Lamoureux's writings where he expresses his belief in Darwinism:

  • "I believe that evolution is a real and valid scientific theory. I believe that the evidence for evolution is overwhelming, and that it is the best explanation we have for the diversity of life on Earth." (I Love Jesus & I Accept Evolution, p. 11)

  • "Darwinism is not a threat to Christianity. In fact, I believe that Darwinism can actually strengthen our faith. When we understand evolution, we can see how God has used the process of evolution to create the world." (Darwinism Defeated?, p. 12)

  • "The Bible is not a scientific textbook. It is a book of faith, and it should not be interpreted literally. When we interpret the Bible in a literal way, we often end up in conflict with science. However, when we interpret the Bible in a more metaphorical way, we can see how it is compatible with evolution." (Struggling with God & Origins, p. 13)


I asked Dennis on his Facebook feed do you do not believe in NeoDarwinism? 

To my surprise he said this:


He was throwing Darwin under the bus!

When I pressed Dennis on which theory of

evolution he believed he admitted:

In other words he's rejected Darwin for Lamarck (epigenetics, the extended theory).

Epigenetics comports with the Bible in ways Darwin doesn't.

The following are ways epigenetics is more consistent with the Bible:

  1. The Bible teaches that our environment can have a profound impact on our lives. For example, the book of Genesis says that God cursed the ground after Adam and Eve ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil (Genesis 3:17). This curse is thought to have had an epigenetic effect on the human genome, leading to increased susceptibility to disease.

  2. The Bible teaches that our choices can have a lasting impact on our descendants. For example, the book of Deuteronomy says that the Israelites would be punished for their sins, even if their children were not directly involved (Deuteronomy 5:9). This suggests that epigenetic changes can be passed down from generation to generation.

  3. The Bible teaches that we have the power to overcome our genetic predispositions. For example, the book of Romans says that we are not bound by our sin nature, but can be free through the power of Christ (Romans 8:2). This suggests that epigenetic changes can be reversed through spiritual transformation.

  4. The Bible teaches that we are all interconnected. For example, the book of 1 Corinthians says that "we are all members of one body" (1 Corinthians 12:27). This suggests that our epigenetics are influenced by the people around us.

  5. The Bible teaches that we have a responsibility to care for our environment. For example, the book of Genesis says that God gave man dominion over the earth (Genesis 1:26). This suggests that we have a responsibility to protect the environment, which can impact our epigenetics.

  6. The Bible teaches that we have hope for the future. For example, the book of Revelation says that "there will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain" (Revelation 21:4). This suggests that one day, all epigenetic changes will be reversed, and we will be free from disease and suffering.

These are just a few of the ways that epigenetics is more consistent with the Bible. As we learn more about epigenetics, we are discovering that it is a powerful force that can shape our lives in profound ways. This new understanding of epigenetics can help us to better understand the Bible, and to live in a way that honors God's creation.


So is Dennis going to write a final book where he corrects his errant NeoDarwinian views?

One can only hope.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Sequence: The Epigenetic "Fingers" That Play the DNA Keyboard

Image
Imagine the keyboard itself is not a standard piano keyboard, but a modular synthesizer, capable of producing an almost infinite array of sounds. The DNA sequence, then, represents the fundamental building blocks of this synthesizer, the raw materials from which all sounds are generated. Epigenetics, our "fingers," manipulates these building blocks, adjusting parameters like volume, timbre, and rhythm, transforming the raw potential of the DNA sequence into a symphony of cellular functions. We can further refine the "fingers" analogy. Consider that each finger represents a distinct epigenetic mechanism: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA.  DNA methylation, for instance, might be the "index finger," capable of precisely silencing specific genes, like muting individual keys on the synthesizer. Histone modifications, the "middle finger," could represent the ability to adjust the accessibility of the DN...
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se...
Read more

Rewriting the Rules: Epigenomic Mutation Bias Challenges Randomness in Evolution

Image
This research challenges the long-held dogma that mutations occur randomly, irrespective of their consequences, by demonstrating a clear, epigenome-mediated mutation bias in Arabidopsis thaliana . The study meticulously unveils how mutation rates are not uniform across the genome but are significantly reduced in functionally constrained regions, particularly within gene bodies and essential genes. This discovery fundamentally alters our understanding of evolutionary processes, suggesting that mutation is not a purely directionless force. "Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana" This opening statement encapsulates the core finding: mutation rates are not random but reflect epigenetic pressures. The authors demonstrate that mutations are less frequent in crucial genomic regions, directly contradicting the prevailing theory of random mutation. This observation suggests an active mechanism that minimizes deleterious mutations in essentia...
Read more