Epigenetics and Junk DNA explains Convergent Evolution better than Darwin


Convergent evolution is the independent evolution of similar features in unrelated lineages. 

Neo-Darwinism is a theory of evolution that explains how evolution occurs through natural selection. Natural selection is the process by which organisms with favorable traits are more likely to survive and reproduce, passing on their genes to the next generation.

Convergent evolution does not fit neatly into the neo-Darwinian framework. This is because neo-Darwinism predicts that similar features should only evolve in closely related lineages. However, convergent evolution shows that similar features can evolve in unrelated lineages, even if they are not closely related.

This has led some scientists to argue that convergent evolution is evidence of intelligent design. They argue that the only way to explain the independent evolution of similar features in unrelated lineages is if there was an intelligent designer who guided the process.

Convergent evolution is a fascinating phenomenon that is also a challenge to neo-Darwinism.

Convergent evolution is the process by which unrelated species evolve similar traits due to similar environmental pressures. For example, sharks and dolphins both have streamlined bodies and fins, which help them swim efficiently in water. These traits evolved independently in sharks and dolphins, but they are similar because they both live in aquatic environments.

How can TEs and ERVs contribute to convergent evolution?

Transposable elements (TEs) are DNA sequences that can move around within a genome. ERVs are a type of TE that are derived from retroviruses. Both TEs and ERVs can affect the expression of genes, which can lead to the evolution of new traits.

For example, TEs and ERVs can insert themselves into genes that control development. This can lead to changes in the way that a particular organ or tissue develops, which can ultimately lead to the evolution of a new trait.

In addition, TEs and ERVs can also be epigenetically silenced. This means that they can be turned off, even though they are still present in the genome. Epigenetic silencing can be caused by environmental factors, such as diet or stress.

If TEs and ERVs are silenced in a particular species, then they will not be able to affect the expression of genes. This can lead to the evolution of a new trait, if the silenced TEs or ERVs were previously affecting the expression of genes that control development.

How does epigenetics explain convergent evolution?

Epigenetics is the study of changes in gene expression that are not caused by changes in DNA sequence. These changes can be caused by environmental factors, such as diet or stress, or by the presence of TEs and ERVs.

Epigenetic changes can be heritable, which means that they can be passed on to offspring. This means that epigenetic changes can potentially contribute to convergent evolution.

For example, if two species are exposed to similar environmental conditions, then they may both experience the same epigenetic changes. These epigenetic changes could then lead to the evolution of similar traits in both species.

TEs, ERVs, and epigenetics can all contribute to convergent evolution. TEs and ERVs can affect the expression of genes, which can lead to the evolution of new traits. Epigenetic changes can also affect the expression of genes, and they can be heritable. This means that epigenetic changes could potentially contribute to convergent evolution.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Sequence: The Epigenetic "Fingers" That Play the DNA Keyboard

Image
Imagine the keyboard itself is not a standard piano keyboard, but a modular synthesizer, capable of producing an almost infinite array of sounds. The DNA sequence, then, represents the fundamental building blocks of this synthesizer, the raw materials from which all sounds are generated. Epigenetics, our "fingers," manipulates these building blocks, adjusting parameters like volume, timbre, and rhythm, transforming the raw potential of the DNA sequence into a symphony of cellular functions. We can further refine the "fingers" analogy. Consider that each finger represents a distinct epigenetic mechanism: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA.  DNA methylation, for instance, might be the "index finger," capable of precisely silencing specific genes, like muting individual keys on the synthesizer. Histone modifications, the "middle finger," could represent the ability to adjust the accessibility of the DN...
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se...
Read more

Rewriting the Rules: Epigenomic Mutation Bias Challenges Randomness in Evolution

Image
This research challenges the long-held dogma that mutations occur randomly, irrespective of their consequences, by demonstrating a clear, epigenome-mediated mutation bias in Arabidopsis thaliana . The study meticulously unveils how mutation rates are not uniform across the genome but are significantly reduced in functionally constrained regions, particularly within gene bodies and essential genes. This discovery fundamentally alters our understanding of evolutionary processes, suggesting that mutation is not a purely directionless force. "Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana" This opening statement encapsulates the core finding: mutation rates are not random but reflect epigenetic pressures. The authors demonstrate that mutations are less frequent in crucial genomic regions, directly contradicting the prevailing theory of random mutation. This observation suggests an active mechanism that minimizes deleterious mutations in essentia...
Read more