ERVs & Epigenetics leads to "Process Structuralism" without Darwin


ERVs, or endogenous retroviruses, are remnants of ancient viruses that have integrated into the genomes of their hosts. They can be found in all animal species, including humans. ERVs are typically inactive, but they can sometimes be reactivated for rapid NonDarwinian speciation and adaptation in a process structuralist format.

Process structuralism is a school of biological thought that objects to an exclusively Darwinian or adaptationist explanation of natural selection. It proposes instead that evolution is guided differently, basically by more or less physical forces which shape the development of an animal's body, and sometimes implies that these forces supersede selection altogether.

Structuralists argue that the traditional Darwinian view of evolution, which focuses on the role of natural selection in shaping adaptation, is incomplete. They point out that many aspects of organismal structure and behavior are not obviously adaptive, and that these features may be better explained by the physical constraints of development.

For example, the four-limbed body plan of vertebrates is a common feature that is shared by many different species, even though it is not clear how this feature would have been adaptive in any particular ancestor. Structuralists argue that this body plan is better explained by the physical constraints of development, such as the need for a stable structure that can support the weight of the body and allow for efficient locomotion. In this sense it it teleological.

Process structuralism has been criticized by some biologists however, it has also been praised for its insights into the role of development in evolution.

Here are some of the key concepts of process structuralism in biology:

  • Structure: The structure of an organism is the set of relations between its parts.

  • Development: The process of development is the process by which an organism's structure is created.

  • Constraints: Constraints are physical or chemical factors that limit the possible forms that an organism can take.

Process structuralism has been applied to a wide range of biological problems, including the evolution of body plans, the evolution of behavior, and the evolution of complex systems. It is a growing field of research, and it is likely to continue to generate new insights into the process of evolution.

Process structuralism is a complex and challenging theory, but it offers a new way of thinking about the process of evolution. It is a field of research that is still in its early stages, but it has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of life.

ERVs (endogenous retroviruses) can help to explain process structuralism. ERVs are genetic sequences that were once viruses, but have been incorporated into the genomes of animals and plants. They are thought to have played a role in the evolution of these organisms, by providing new genes or by influencing the expression of existing genes.

Process structuralists argue that natural selection is not the only force that drives evolution. They point to the fact that many ERVs are found in non-coding regions of the genome, where they are not under the direct influence of natural selection. They argue that these ERVs may have been incorporated into the genome because they interact with other genes in a way that is beneficial to the organism.

For example, some ERVs have been found to regulate the expression of genes involved in development. This suggests that ERVs may have played a role in the evolution of different body plans.

Process structuralists believe that ERVs can help to explain the complexity of life. They argue that the interactions between ERVs and other genes can create new genetic networks that are not possible with just natural selection. This could lead to the evolution of new traits and even new species.

ERVs provide an interesting potential explanation for process structuralism.

Researchers found that the distribution of ERVs in Darwin's finches was not random. Instead, they were more likely to be found in certain regions of the genome, and they varied in abundance between different finch species. The researchers believe that this non-random distribution of ERVs may be associated with the rapid speciation of Darwin's finches.

One possibility is that ERVs can contribute to speciation by providing new genetic variation. When ERVs are reactivated, they can insert themselves into new locations in the genome, which can lead to changes in gene expression. These changes in gene expression can then give rise to new traits, which can help individuals to adapt to new environments.

Another possibility is that ERVs can promote speciation by disrupting the function of genes that are important for maintaining genetic compatibility between species. When ERVs insert themselves into genes, they can disrupt the function of those genes. This can make it more difficult for individuals from different species to mate and produce offspring.

The study of ERVs in Darwin's finches is still ongoing, but it is providing new insights into the mechanisms of speciation. Researchers believe that ERVs may play a role in the rapid speciation of Darwin's finches, and they are continuing to investigate this possibility.

Epigenetic control of ERVs is a relatively new field of research, but it has the potential to shed light on how these elements contribute to structuralism.  Epigenetic changes can affect how genes are expressed, which can in turn affect the development and function of cells and tissues.

Epigenetic changes controls ERVs. For example, one study found that DNA methylation, an epigenetic modification, can silence ERVs. This suggests that epigenetic changes may play a role in regulating the expression of ERVs, and that these changes could contribute to structuralism.

It is possible that epigenetic changes can affect ERV expression in a variety of ways, and that these changes may contribute to a variety of structuralist phenotypes.

Here are some of the ways that epigenetics could control ERVs:

  • DNA methylation: DNA methylation is a chemical modification of DNA that can silence genes. ERVs are often methylated, which can prevent them from being expressed.

  • Histone modification: Histone proteins are responsible for packaging DNA into chromosomes. Histone modifications can affect how tightly DNA is packed, which can in turn affect gene expression. ERVs are often associated with changes in histone modification, which could affect their expression.

  • Chromatin remodeling: Chromatin is the complex of DNA and proteins that makes up chromosomes. Chromatin remodeling is the process of changing the structure of chromatin, which can affect gene expression. ERVs are often associated with changes in chromatin remodeling, which could affect their expression.

These are just a few of the ways that epigenetics controls ERVs under the umbrella of process structuralism.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Sequence: The Epigenetic "Fingers" That Play the DNA Keyboard

Image
Imagine the keyboard itself is not a standard piano keyboard, but a modular synthesizer, capable of producing an almost infinite array of sounds. The DNA sequence, then, represents the fundamental building blocks of this synthesizer, the raw materials from which all sounds are generated. Epigenetics, our "fingers," manipulates these building blocks, adjusting parameters like volume, timbre, and rhythm, transforming the raw potential of the DNA sequence into a symphony of cellular functions. We can further refine the "fingers" analogy. Consider that each finger represents a distinct epigenetic mechanism: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA.  DNA methylation, for instance, might be the "index finger," capable of precisely silencing specific genes, like muting individual keys on the synthesizer. Histone modifications, the "middle finger," could represent the ability to adjust the accessibility of the DN...
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se...
Read more

Rewriting the Rules: Epigenomic Mutation Bias Challenges Randomness in Evolution

Image
This research challenges the long-held dogma that mutations occur randomly, irrespective of their consequences, by demonstrating a clear, epigenome-mediated mutation bias in Arabidopsis thaliana . The study meticulously unveils how mutation rates are not uniform across the genome but are significantly reduced in functionally constrained regions, particularly within gene bodies and essential genes. This discovery fundamentally alters our understanding of evolutionary processes, suggesting that mutation is not a purely directionless force. "Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana" This opening statement encapsulates the core finding: mutation rates are not random but reflect epigenetic pressures. The authors demonstrate that mutations are less frequent in crucial genomic regions, directly contradicting the prevailing theory of random mutation. This observation suggests an active mechanism that minimizes deleterious mutations in essentia...
Read more