Just 10 reasons Epigenetics is Lamarckian plus many more...


Here are just 10 articles on the connection of epigenetics and Lamarck's evolution:

  1. Lamarckism and epigenetic inheritance: a clarification. Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10539-018-9642-2

  2. Epigenetic memory: the Lamarckian brain. Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193930/

  3. The return of Lamarck?. Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3564019/

  4. Lamarck rises from his grave: parental environment‐induced epigenetic inheritance in model organisms and humans. Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/brv.12322

  5. Lifestyle in the sperm: There is growing evidence that epigenetic marks can be inherited. But what is the nature of the information they store and over how many generations do they prevail?. Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4264925/

  6. Epigenetics, Darwin, and Lamarck. Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4494054/

  7. Epigenetics: a new paradigm for understanding the biology of aging and age-related diseases. Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/nrg3987

  8. Epigenetics and the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/nrg2233

  9. Epigenetics: the science of change. Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd3917

  10. Epigenetics and the environment. Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/nrg3838

And many more at Google Scholar: Link


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Sequence: The Epigenetic "Fingers" That Play the DNA Keyboard

Image
Imagine the keyboard itself is not a standard piano keyboard, but a modular synthesizer, capable of producing an almost infinite array of sounds. The DNA sequence, then, represents the fundamental building blocks of this synthesizer, the raw materials from which all sounds are generated. Epigenetics, our "fingers," manipulates these building blocks, adjusting parameters like volume, timbre, and rhythm, transforming the raw potential of the DNA sequence into a symphony of cellular functions. We can further refine the "fingers" analogy. Consider that each finger represents a distinct epigenetic mechanism: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA.  DNA methylation, for instance, might be the "index finger," capable of precisely silencing specific genes, like muting individual keys on the synthesizer. Histone modifications, the "middle finger," could represent the ability to adjust the accessibility of the DN...
Read more

Rewriting the Rules: Epigenomic Mutation Bias Challenges Randomness in Evolution

Image
This research challenges the long-held dogma that mutations occur randomly, irrespective of their consequences, by demonstrating a clear, epigenome-mediated mutation bias in Arabidopsis thaliana . The study meticulously unveils how mutation rates are not uniform across the genome but are significantly reduced in functionally constrained regions, particularly within gene bodies and essential genes. This discovery fundamentally alters our understanding of evolutionary processes, suggesting that mutation is not a purely directionless force. "Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana" This opening statement encapsulates the core finding: mutation rates are not random but reflect epigenetic pressures. The authors demonstrate that mutations are less frequent in crucial genomic regions, directly contradicting the prevailing theory of random mutation. This observation suggests an active mechanism that minimizes deleterious mutations in essentia...
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se...
Read more