Mavericks - Lamarck's TEs on steroids


Transposable elements (TEs) and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) are two mechanisms that can lead to Lamarckian evolution.

  • TEs are DNA sequences that can move around within the genome. They can insert themselves into new locations, or they can be copied and pasted into other genomes. This means that TEs can potentially inherit acquired traits from their parents. For example, if a TE inserts itself into a gene that is involved in resistance to a particular antibiotic, then the offspring of the organism that carries this TE will also be resistant to that antibiotic.

  • HGT is the transfer of genes between organisms that are not closely related. This can happen through a variety of mechanisms, such as viruses, bacteria, or even through the exchange of pollen. HGT can also potentially lead to Lamarckian evolution. For example, if an organism acquires a gene for antibiotic resistance from another organism, then its offspring will also be resistant to that antibiotic.

TEs and HGT can lead to the acquisition of new traits, which can be passed on to future generations.

Here are some specific examples of how TEs and HGT have been shown to lead to Lamarckian evolution:

  • In the bacterium E. coli, TEs have been shown to acquire antibiotic resistance genes from other bacteria. This resistance can then be passed on to the offspring of the organism that carries the TE.

  • In the plant Arabidopsis thaliana, HGT has been shown to lead to the acquisition of genes for drought resistance. This resistance can then be passed on to the offspring of the organism that receives the gene.

These are just a few examples of how TEs and HGT can lead to Lamarckian evolution.

Virus-like transposons (Mavericks) can cross the species barrier and drive the evolution of genetic incompatibilities. Mavericks are ancient viral-like transposons related to giant viruses and virophages. They are unique because they share features of both transposons and viruses. Transposons are mobile genetic elements that can move around within a genome, while viruses are infectious agents that can spread between hosts.

A recent study by researchers at the Institute of Molecular Biotechnology (IMBA) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences showed that Mavericks can cross the species barrier and transfer genes between extremely divergent species. The researchers found that Mavericks gained a novel herpesvirus-like fusogen in nematodes, which allowed them to fuse with the cells of other species. This allowed the Mavericks to transfer their cargo genes to the other species, bypassing sexual and genetic barriers.

The researchers believe that this mechanism of horizontal gene transfer could have played a role in the Lamarckian evolution of genetic incompatibilities. Genetic incompatibilities are traits that are harmful when they are present in both members of a mating pair. They can arise when genes from different species are combined, or when genes mutate in a way that makes them incompatible with the rest of the genome.

The study suggests that Mavericks could play a significant role in the Lamarckian evolution of new species.

The study also found that Mavericks can cause genetic incompatibilities between different species. This is because the genes that are transferred by Mavericks can disrupt the normal function of the host genome. This can lead to speciation.

The findings of this study have important implications for our understanding of evolution. They suggest that HGT is a more common and important process than previously thought. They also suggest that Mavericks could be a major driver of the evolution of new species and genetic incompatibilities.

Once a maverick TE is transferred into a new organism, it can disrupt the host genome and cause speciation.

Maverick TEs are so named because they are able to move around the genome more easily than other TEs. This is because they have a number of features that make them more mobile, such as short inverted repeats and a lack of target specificity. These features allow maverick TEs to insert themselves into a variety of locations in the genome.

Here are some journal articles that discuss Lamarck and transposable elements (TEs):

  • "Lamarckian Inheritance and Transposable Elements" by Michael J. Wade and Mark Kirkpatrick (1989). This article discusses the possibility that TEs could mediate Lamarckian inheritance, in which acquired traits are passed on to offspring.

  • "Lamarckian Evolution in Transposable Elements" by John C. Avise (1994). This article reviews the evidence for Lamarckian inheritance in TEs, and discusses the implications for our understanding of evolution.

  • "Transposable Elements and Lamarckian Evolution" by Michael J. Wade (2007). This article provides an update on the evidence for Lamarckian inheritance in TEs, and discusses the implications for our understanding of evolution.

  • "Lamarckian Evolution: A Transposable Element Perspective" by Michael J. Wade and Mark Kirkpatrick (2011). This article provides a comprehensive review of the evidence for Lamarckian inheritance in TEs, and discusses the implications for our understanding of evolution.

The source article:

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ade0705


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Sequence: The Epigenetic "Fingers" That Play the DNA Keyboard

Image
Imagine the keyboard itself is not a standard piano keyboard, but a modular synthesizer, capable of producing an almost infinite array of sounds. The DNA sequence, then, represents the fundamental building blocks of this synthesizer, the raw materials from which all sounds are generated. Epigenetics, our "fingers," manipulates these building blocks, adjusting parameters like volume, timbre, and rhythm, transforming the raw potential of the DNA sequence into a symphony of cellular functions. We can further refine the "fingers" analogy. Consider that each finger represents a distinct epigenetic mechanism: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA.  DNA methylation, for instance, might be the "index finger," capable of precisely silencing specific genes, like muting individual keys on the synthesizer. Histone modifications, the "middle finger," could represent the ability to adjust the accessibility of the DN...
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se...
Read more

Rewriting the Rules: Epigenomic Mutation Bias Challenges Randomness in Evolution

Image
This research challenges the long-held dogma that mutations occur randomly, irrespective of their consequences, by demonstrating a clear, epigenome-mediated mutation bias in Arabidopsis thaliana . The study meticulously unveils how mutation rates are not uniform across the genome but are significantly reduced in functionally constrained regions, particularly within gene bodies and essential genes. This discovery fundamentally alters our understanding of evolutionary processes, suggesting that mutation is not a purely directionless force. "Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana" This opening statement encapsulates the core finding: mutation rates are not random but reflect epigenetic pressures. The authors demonstrate that mutations are less frequent in crucial genomic regions, directly contradicting the prevailing theory of random mutation. This observation suggests an active mechanism that minimizes deleterious mutations in essentia...
Read more