IDPs act as Maxwells Demon without Neodarwinism


Neo-Darwinian evolution is the theory that evolution occurs by natural selection acting on genetic variation in populations. Maxwell's demon is a hypothetical being that can violate the second law of thermodynamics by opening and closing a door between two chambers of gas, allowing only fast-moving molecules to enter one chamber and only slow-moving molecules to enter the other.

Neo-Darwinian structured proteins cannot act like Maxwell's demons because they are not capable of opening and closing doors. They are also not capable of distinguishing between fast-moving and slow-moving molecules. In fact, structured proteins are themselves subject to the second law of thermodynamics. They tend to become disordered over time, unless they are constantly being repaired by enzymes.

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) have been proposed to act like Maxwell's demons. Maxwell's demon is a thought experiment that challenges the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy always increases in a closed system. The demon is a hypothetical being that can control the movement of particles in a system, allowing high-entropy particles to move to a low-entropy state, thereby reducing the entropy of the system.

IDPs are proteins that lack a fixed or ordered three-dimensional structure. This means that they can adopt a variety of different conformations, depending on their environment. This property allows IDPs to act as Maxwell's demons by binding to specific molecules and then changing their conformation to release those molecules in a controlled manner. This can be used to transport molecules across membranes, regulate gene expression, and perform other cellular functions.

One example of an IDP that acts like a Maxwell's demon is the transcription factor NF-κB. NF-κB is a protein that controls the expression of genes involved in inflammation and immunity. It is an IDP that can bind to DNA and then change its conformation to release the DNA, thereby activating the transcription of those genes.

Another example of an IDP that acts like a Maxwell's demon is the RNA-binding protein HuR. HuR is an IDP that binds to RNA and then changes its conformation to release the RNA, thereby regulating the translation of those genes.

IDPs are a fascinating class of proteins that are still not fully understood. However, their ability to act like Maxwell's demons suggests that they play a key role in many cellular processes.

Here are some additional details about how IDPs can act like Maxwell's demons:

  • IDPs can bind to specific molecules with high affinity. This allows them to selectively capture those molecules from a solution.

  • IDPs can change their conformation in response to changes in their environment. This allows them to release the molecules they have bound to in a controlled manner.

  • The ability of IDPs to act like Maxwell's demons is limited by the amount of entropy they can reduce. However, they can still be used to perform useful work, such as transporting molecules across membranes or regulating gene expression.

Overall, IDPs are a promising class of proteins that can be used to develop new drugs and therapies. By understanding how IDPs act like Maxwell's demons, we can develop new ways to harness their power to improve human health.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Epigenetics explains Neanderthal and Human differences better than Neo-Darwinism

Image
Article :” Unveiling the Epigenetic Landscape of Our Closest Extinct Relatives: A Tale of Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA Methylation,” by Nobel Laureate Svante Pääbo, Science (4/14) The realm of epigenetics, a relatively young branch of genetics, delves into the intricate interplay between genes and their environment, deciphering how factors beyond DNA sequence influence gene expression. DNA methylation, a key epigenetic mechanism, involves the addition of a methyl group to cytosine bases, altering gene activity. By unraveling ancient DNA methylation patterns, scientists have gained unprecedented insights into the epigenetic landscape of our long-lost relatives – the Neanderthals and Denisovans. Harnessing the power of computational methods, researchers have ingeniously reconstructed the DNA methylation maps of Neanderthals and Denisovans, capitalizing on the natural degradation processes of methylated and unmethylated cytosines in ancient DNA. By comparing these methylatio
Read more

Many Evolutionists can't "evolve" with Epigenetics

Image
M any evolutionists believe that epigenetics challenges neo-Darwinism. Neo-Darwinism is the prevailing theory of evolution, and it states that evolution is driven by natural selection, which acts on random mutations in the DNA sequence. Epigenetics, on the other hand, is the study of changes in gene expression that are not caused by changes in the DNA sequence itself. Epigenetic changes can be passed down from parents to offspring, and they can be influenced by the environment. This raises a number of challenges for neo-Darwinism. First, it challenges the view that natural selection is the only driving force in evolution. Epigenetic changes can occur without mutations in the DNA sequence, so they can provide a way for organisms to adapt to their environment more quickly than natural selection alone can explain. Second, it challenges the view that evolution is a gradual process. Epigenetic changes can be large and sudden , and they can have a significant impact on an
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se
Read more