Epistasis challenges NeoDarwinism

Epistasis is a genetic phenomenon in which the phenotypic expression of one gene is influenced by the genotype of another gene. This is in contrast to NeoDarwinism and Mendelian genetics, which states that each gene has a unique and independent effect on a phenotype.

There are two main types of epistasis:

  • Additive epistasis: This occurs when the effects of two genes are added together to produce a phenotype. For example, two genes may control the color of a flower, and the additive effect of the two genes determines the final color of the flower.

  • Non-additive epistasis: This occurs when the effects of two genes are not simply added together. For example, one gene may control the production of a protein, and another gene may control the breakdown of that protein. The non-additive interaction between these two genes could result in a phenotype that is different from either of the two genes alone.

Neodarwinism is a theory of evolution that states that evolution is driven by natural selection acting on genetic variation. Neo Darwinism does not account for epistasis, and there are a number of ways in which epistasis is not explained by neo darwinism.

Here are 10 ways epistasis is not explained by neo darwinism:

  1. Epistasis can produce phenotypes that are not predicted by Mendelian genetics and neo darwinism.

  2. Epistasis can create genetic dependencies, in which the expression of one gene is dependent on the genotype of another gene.

  3. Epistasis can lead to genetic robustness, in which a population is resistant to changes in the environment.

  4. Epistasis can canalize evolution, in which a population evolves along a certain pathway.

  5. Epistasis can create genetic incompatibilities, which can prevent species from interbreeding.

  6. Epistasis can can lead to genetic polymorphism, in which a population contains multiple genotypes for a particular trait.

  7. Epistasis can can lead to genetic drift, in which the allele frequencies in a population change randomly.

  8. Epistasis can can lead to genetic hitchhiking, in which a beneficial allele is linked to a harmful allele and is passed on to future generations.

  9. Epistasis can can lead to genetic suppression, in which a gene is prevented from being expressed.

  10. Epistasis can can lead to genetic pleiotropy, in which a single gene affects multiple traits.

These are just a few of the ways in which epistasis is not explained by neo darwinism. Epistasis is a complex phenomenon that has important implications for our understanding of evolution.

In addition to the 10 ways listed above, epistasis can also complicate the interpretation of genetic studies. For example, a study that finds a correlation between a particular gene and a trait may not be able to determine whether the gene is directly affecting the trait or whether it is interacting with other genes to produce the observed effect.

Despite the challenges it presents, epistasis is an important phenomenon that needs to be taken into account in our understanding of evolution. By understanding epistasis, we can better understand how genes interact to produce complex traits and how evolution can shape the genetic makeup of populations.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Sequence: The Epigenetic "Fingers" That Play the DNA Keyboard

Image
Imagine the keyboard itself is not a standard piano keyboard, but a modular synthesizer, capable of producing an almost infinite array of sounds. The DNA sequence, then, represents the fundamental building blocks of this synthesizer, the raw materials from which all sounds are generated. Epigenetics, our "fingers," manipulates these building blocks, adjusting parameters like volume, timbre, and rhythm, transforming the raw potential of the DNA sequence into a symphony of cellular functions. We can further refine the "fingers" analogy. Consider that each finger represents a distinct epigenetic mechanism: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA.  DNA methylation, for instance, might be the "index finger," capable of precisely silencing specific genes, like muting individual keys on the synthesizer. Histone modifications, the "middle finger," could represent the ability to adjust the accessibility of the DN...
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se...
Read more

Rewriting the Rules: Epigenomic Mutation Bias Challenges Randomness in Evolution

Image
This research challenges the long-held dogma that mutations occur randomly, irrespective of their consequences, by demonstrating a clear, epigenome-mediated mutation bias in Arabidopsis thaliana . The study meticulously unveils how mutation rates are not uniform across the genome but are significantly reduced in functionally constrained regions, particularly within gene bodies and essential genes. This discovery fundamentally alters our understanding of evolutionary processes, suggesting that mutation is not a purely directionless force. "Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana" This opening statement encapsulates the core finding: mutation rates are not random but reflect epigenetic pressures. The authors demonstrate that mutations are less frequent in crucial genomic regions, directly contradicting the prevailing theory of random mutation. This observation suggests an active mechanism that minimizes deleterious mutations in essentia...
Read more