Genetic robustness challenges NeoDarwinism


Genetic robustness is the ability of a living organism to maintain its normal phenotype, even when its genotype is changed. This can be achieved through a variety of mechanisms, such as gene duplication, redundancy, and developmental compensation.

Neo Darwinism is the modern synthesis of Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection with Mendelian genetics. It is the waning theory of evolution today.

Genetic robustness challenges neodarwinism in a number of ways. Here are 10 examples:

  1. Genetic robustness can limit the effects of mutations. Neodarwinism relies on the idea that mutations are the ultimate source of genetic variation, which is essential for natural selection to work. However, genetic robustness can make it difficult for mutations to have a significant effect on the phenotype of an organism. This can limit the rate of evolution and make it more difficult for new species to emerge.

  2. Genetic robustness can allow organisms to tolerate environmental changes. Neodarwinism typically assumes that environmental changes will drive natural selection, leading to the evolution of new adaptations. However, genetic robustness can allow organisms to tolerate environmental changes without having to evolve new adaptations. This can make it difficult for natural selection to operate effectively.

  3. Genetic robustness can promote the evolution of complexity. Neodarwinism has difficulty explaining the evolution of complex biological systems, such as the eye or the immune system. However, genetic robustness can make it possible for complex systems to evolve by providing a buffer against harmful mutations.

  4. Genetic robustness can constrain the evolution of new traits. Neodarwinism typically assumes that natural selection can favor any new trait that is beneficial to an organism. However, genetic robustness can constrain the evolution of new traits by making it difficult to break existing developmental pathways.

  5. Genetic robustness can lead to the evolution of non-adaptive traits. Neodarwinism typically assumes that only traits that are beneficial to an organism will evolve. However, genetic robustness can lead to the evolution of non-adaptive traits, such as vestigial organs, simply because they are neutral to the organism's fitness.

  6. Genetic robustness can promote the evolution of canalization. Canalization is a process by which organisms become more resistant to environmental perturbations. Neodarwinism has difficulty explaining the evolution of canalization, but genetic robustness can provide a mechanism for it.

  7. Genetic robustness can promote the evolution of genetic diversity. Neodarwinism typically assumes that genetic diversity is important for evolution because it allows for the emergence of new beneficial mutations. However, genetic robustness can also promote the evolution of genetic diversity by making it less likely that harmful mutations will be eliminated from a population.

  8. Genetic robustness can promote the evolution of cooperation. Neodarwinism has difficulty explaining the evolution of cooperation, because cooperation often seems to be altruistic, meaning that it benefits others at the expense of the individual. However, genetic robustness can make it possible for cooperation to evolve by making it less likely that individuals who cooperate will be harmed by cheaters.

  9. Genetic robustness can promote the evolution of evolvability. Evolvability is the ability of a population to evolve new traits. Neodarwinism has difficulty explaining the evolution of evolvability, but genetic robustness can provide a mechanism for it.

  10. Genetic robustness can promote the evolution of life. Neodarwinism typically assumes that life is fragile and that it would be easy for it to go extinct. However, genetic robustness can make life more robust and less susceptible to extinction.

Genetic robustness challenges the core tenets of neo darwinism.

Genetic robustness is a complex and fascinating topic, and it is still an area of active research. Scientists are still learning about how genetic robustness works and how it affects evolution.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Sequence: The Epigenetic "Fingers" That Play the DNA Keyboard

Image
Imagine the keyboard itself is not a standard piano keyboard, but a modular synthesizer, capable of producing an almost infinite array of sounds. The DNA sequence, then, represents the fundamental building blocks of this synthesizer, the raw materials from which all sounds are generated. Epigenetics, our "fingers," manipulates these building blocks, adjusting parameters like volume, timbre, and rhythm, transforming the raw potential of the DNA sequence into a symphony of cellular functions. We can further refine the "fingers" analogy. Consider that each finger represents a distinct epigenetic mechanism: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA.  DNA methylation, for instance, might be the "index finger," capable of precisely silencing specific genes, like muting individual keys on the synthesizer. Histone modifications, the "middle finger," could represent the ability to adjust the accessibility of the DN...
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se...
Read more

Rewriting the Rules: Epigenomic Mutation Bias Challenges Randomness in Evolution

Image
This research challenges the long-held dogma that mutations occur randomly, irrespective of their consequences, by demonstrating a clear, epigenome-mediated mutation bias in Arabidopsis thaliana . The study meticulously unveils how mutation rates are not uniform across the genome but are significantly reduced in functionally constrained regions, particularly within gene bodies and essential genes. This discovery fundamentally alters our understanding of evolutionary processes, suggesting that mutation is not a purely directionless force. "Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana" This opening statement encapsulates the core finding: mutation rates are not random but reflect epigenetic pressures. The authors demonstrate that mutations are less frequent in crucial genomic regions, directly contradicting the prevailing theory of random mutation. This observation suggests an active mechanism that minimizes deleterious mutations in essentia...
Read more