Mutation hotspots controlled by DNA hairpins without Darwin


Inverted repeats are DNA sequences that are repeated in reverse order. They are not predicted by the neo-Darwinian model of evolution, which states that mutations are random and occur with equal probability at all positions in the genome.

In order to form an inverted repeat, two mutations would need to occur in the same gene, at the same location, but in opposite directions. This is a very unlikely event, and it is estimated to occur only once in every billion years.

However, inverted repeats are found in many different organisms, suggesting that they are not simply the result of random mutations. The exact mechanism by which inverted repeats form is still not fully understood, but their existence challenges the neo-Darwinian model of evolution. It suggests that mutations are not always random, and that they can be influenced by other factors.

Scientists propose that short inverted repeats on the same DNA strand can form single-stranded hairpin structures. These hairpin structures can make it more difficult for DNA polymerase to accurately replicate the DNA, which can lead to mutations.

The formation of these hairpin structures is contingent on the DNA sequence variation. If a synonymous mutation changes the sequence of one of the inverted repeats, it can disrupt the hairpin structure and make it less likely to form. 

For 60 years scientists thought synonymous mutations were neutral per neo darwinism.

Synonymous mutations can lead to a decrease in the number of mutations that occur in the region of the gene.

In one study, the authors found that introducing synonymous mutations into inverted repeats could decrease the number of mutations that occurred in the surrounding region of the gene.

The authors' findings suggest that synonymous mutations can have a more significant impact on the local mutational bias of a gene than previously thought. This is because synonymous mutations can disrupt the formation of hairpin structures, which can lead to a decrease in the number of mutations that occur.

Here are some additional details about hairpin structures:

  • Hairpin structures are formed when two complementary sequences of DNA base pairs with each other.

  • Hairpin structures can be single-stranded or double-stranded.

  • Single-stranded hairpin structures are more likely to form in regions of DNA that are rich in repeated sequences.

  • Hairpin structures can interfere with DNA replication and repair, which can lead to mutations.




The Article "A mutational hotspot that determines highly repeatable evolution can be built and broken by silent genetic changes," discusses how this occurs.

The article is about a study that was conducted on the bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens. The researchers were interested in understanding how mutational hotspots, which are regions of the genome that are more likely to mutate than others, are formed and maintained.

They found that a mutational hotspot in the ntrB gene of P. fluorescens could be built and broken by a handful of silent mutations. Silent (synonymous) mutations are mutations that do not change the amino acid sequence of the protein that the gene encodes.

The researchers found that the mutational hotspot was created by a combination of two factors:

  • The presence of a DNA sequence that is prone to mutation.

  • The presence of a protein that binds to the DNA sequence and makes it more susceptible to mutation.

The silent mutations that broke the mutational hotspot did so by disrupting the binding of the protein to the DNA hairpin sequences. This made the DNA sequence less susceptible to mutation, and the hotspot was no longer formed.

The findings of this study suggest that silent mutations can play a significant role in the formation and maintenance of mutational hotspots. This is important because mutational hotspots can have a major impact on evolution. They can make it more likely that beneficial mutations will occur, and they can also make it more difficult for harmful mutations to be fixed.

Overall, the findings of this study highlight the importance of silent mutations in evolution and disease. They suggest that silent mutations are not just neutral changes, but that they can have a significant impact on the genetic makeup of organisms. 

This challenges 60 years of evolutionary theory. 

This is an important area of research that is likely to yield new insights into the genetic basis of life.

Here are some additional thoughts on the implications of this study:

  • The study suggests that silent mutations can be a powerful force in evolution. By breaking mutational hotspots, silent mutations can make it more difficult for beneficial mutations to occur, and they can also make it more likely that harmful mutations will be fixed. This could have a major impact on the evolution of populations and species.

  • The study also has implications for our understanding of cancer. Cancer is often caused by mutations in genes that control cell growth and division. The findings of this study suggest that silent mutations may play a role in the formation of these mutations. This could lead to new approaches to cancer prevention and treatment.

  • The study is also important because it highlights the importance of studying silent mutations. Silent mutations are often overlooked, but they can have a significant impact on the genetic makeup of organisms. By studying silent mutations, we can gain a better understanding of the genetic basis of life and the evolution of disease.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Sequence: The Epigenetic "Fingers" That Play the DNA Keyboard

Image
Imagine the keyboard itself is not a standard piano keyboard, but a modular synthesizer, capable of producing an almost infinite array of sounds. The DNA sequence, then, represents the fundamental building blocks of this synthesizer, the raw materials from which all sounds are generated. Epigenetics, our "fingers," manipulates these building blocks, adjusting parameters like volume, timbre, and rhythm, transforming the raw potential of the DNA sequence into a symphony of cellular functions. We can further refine the "fingers" analogy. Consider that each finger represents a distinct epigenetic mechanism: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA.  DNA methylation, for instance, might be the "index finger," capable of precisely silencing specific genes, like muting individual keys on the synthesizer. Histone modifications, the "middle finger," could represent the ability to adjust the accessibility of the DN...
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se...
Read more

Rewriting the Rules: Epigenomic Mutation Bias Challenges Randomness in Evolution

Image
This research challenges the long-held dogma that mutations occur randomly, irrespective of their consequences, by demonstrating a clear, epigenome-mediated mutation bias in Arabidopsis thaliana . The study meticulously unveils how mutation rates are not uniform across the genome but are significantly reduced in functionally constrained regions, particularly within gene bodies and essential genes. This discovery fundamentally alters our understanding of evolutionary processes, suggesting that mutation is not a purely directionless force. "Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana" This opening statement encapsulates the core finding: mutation rates are not random but reflect epigenetic pressures. The authors demonstrate that mutations are less frequent in crucial genomic regions, directly contradicting the prevailing theory of random mutation. This observation suggests an active mechanism that minimizes deleterious mutations in essentia...
Read more