Pleiotropy Challenges NeoDarwinism


Pleiotropy is the phenomenon of a single gene having multiple, often unrelated, effects on an organism. It is a widespread phenomenon in biology, and it has a number of implications for Neo-Darwinism, the waining theory of evolution.

Here are 10 ways pleiotropy challenges Neo-Darwinism:

  1. Pleiotropy makes it difficult for natural selection to act on individual traits. If a single gene affects multiple traits, then changing the gene to favor one trait may have negative consequences for other traits. This can make it difficult for natural selection to drive the evolution of complex adaptations, which often require changes to multiple genes.

  2. Pleiotropy can lead to genetic trade-offs. If a gene has both positive and negative effects, then organisms that have the gene may be more fit in some environments but less fit in others. This can make it difficult for natural selection to favor the gene in any one environment.

  3. Pleiotropy can constrain evolution. If a gene has multiple important effects, then changes to the gene may have negative consequences for the organism's overall fitness. This can constrain the evolution of the gene, even if it would be beneficial for some of the traits that the gene affects.

  4. Pleiotropy can explain the persistence of harmful traits. If a gene has both positive and negative effects, then it may be difficult for natural selection to eliminate the gene from the population, even if the negative effects are severe. This can explain the persistence of harmful traits such as genetic diseases.

  5. Pleiotropy can explain the evolution of complex traits. Pleiotropy can lead to the evolution of complex traits NeoDarwinism can't explain.

  6. Pleiotropy can explain the evolution of altruism. Pleiotropy can explain the evolution of altruistic behaviors natural selection can't explain. Natural selection is selfish, not altruistic. For example, a gene that causes an animal to sacrifice itself to protect its offspring. Natural selections "survival of the fittest" does not allow for this. 

  7. Pleiotropy can explain the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Pleiotropy can explain the evolution of sexual dimorphism, the difference in physical characteristics between males and females of the same species. Natural selection only acts on the more fit to survive eg male.

  8. Pleiotropy can explain the evolution of genetic correlations. Pleiotropy can explain the evolution of genetic correlations, the tendency for genes that affect one trait to also affect other traits. Genetic correlations can be caused by pleiotropy if the genes have multiple effects on different traits.

  9. Pleiotropy can explain the evolution of canalization. Pleiotropy can explain the evolution of canalization, the ability of organisms to develop normally despite environmental disturbances. Canalization can be caused by pleiotropy if the genes that control development have multiple effects on different traits.

  10. Pleiotropy can explain the evolution of evolvability. Pleiotropy can explain the evolution of evolvability, the ability of organisms to evolve new traits. Evolvability can be caused by pleiotropy if the genes that control development also have effects on other genes.

Overall, pleiotropy is a complex phenomenon that has a number of implications for Neo-Darwinism. It can make it difficult for natural selection to act on individual traits, lead to genetic trade-offs, constrain evolution, and explain the persistence of harmful traits. However, pleiotropy can also explain the evolution of complex traits, altruism, sexual dimorphism, genetic correlations, canalization, and evolvability.

Pleiotropy is only one area where Neo-Darwinism has encountered challenges. As scientists learn more about pleiotropy, they may be able to develop new insights into the process of evolution without NeoDarwinism.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Sequence: The Epigenetic "Fingers" That Play the DNA Keyboard

Image
Imagine the keyboard itself is not a standard piano keyboard, but a modular synthesizer, capable of producing an almost infinite array of sounds. The DNA sequence, then, represents the fundamental building blocks of this synthesizer, the raw materials from which all sounds are generated. Epigenetics, our "fingers," manipulates these building blocks, adjusting parameters like volume, timbre, and rhythm, transforming the raw potential of the DNA sequence into a symphony of cellular functions. We can further refine the "fingers" analogy. Consider that each finger represents a distinct epigenetic mechanism: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA.  DNA methylation, for instance, might be the "index finger," capable of precisely silencing specific genes, like muting individual keys on the synthesizer. Histone modifications, the "middle finger," could represent the ability to adjust the accessibility of the DN...
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se...
Read more

Rewriting the Rules: Epigenomic Mutation Bias Challenges Randomness in Evolution

Image
This research challenges the long-held dogma that mutations occur randomly, irrespective of their consequences, by demonstrating a clear, epigenome-mediated mutation bias in Arabidopsis thaliana . The study meticulously unveils how mutation rates are not uniform across the genome but are significantly reduced in functionally constrained regions, particularly within gene bodies and essential genes. This discovery fundamentally alters our understanding of evolutionary processes, suggesting that mutation is not a purely directionless force. "Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana" This opening statement encapsulates the core finding: mutation rates are not random but reflect epigenetic pressures. The authors demonstrate that mutations are less frequent in crucial genomic regions, directly contradicting the prevailing theory of random mutation. This observation suggests an active mechanism that minimizes deleterious mutations in essentia...
Read more