Waddington's epigenetic landscape: A framework for post-Darwinian biology?


The paper "The molecular and mathematical basis of Waddington's epigenetic landscape: A framework for post-Darwinian biology?" by Sui Huang  discusses the relationship between Waddington's epigenetic landscape and gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Waddington's epigenetic landscape is a metaphor for the developmental process, with different phenotypes represented by valleys and ridges.


GRNs are complex networks of interactions between genes that control gene expression.


Huang argues that GRNs can be used to model the epigenetic landscape, and that this can provide a framework for understanding post-Darwinian biology.

One of the key ideas of the paper is that GRNs are non-linear and stochastic. This means that the output of a GRN can be unpredictable, even if the inputs are known. This is because the interactions between genes can be complex and non-additive. Huang argues that this non-linearity and stochasticity is essential for understanding the epigenetic landscape.

Another key idea of the paper is that the epigenetic landscape is shaped by NonDarwinian evolution. Biased mutations can alter the GRN, which can change the topography of the landscape. This can lead to new phenotypes and new evolutionary trajectories. Huang argues that this link between genetic biased mutations and epigenetic landscape provides a framework for understanding sudden, broad evolutionary changes.

The paper concludes by discussing the implications of the epigenetic landscape model for post-Darwinian biology. Huang argues that the model can help us to understand a variety of phenomena, including the evolution of complex traits, the origin of new species, and the role of epigenetics in human disease.

Here is a more detailed summary of the paper's main points:

  • The epigenetic landscape is a metaphor for the developmental process. It is a surface with valleys and ridges, where different phenotypes are represented by different positions on the surface.

  • Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) can be used to model the epigenetic landscape. GRNs are complex networks of interactions between genes that control gene expression.

  • GRNs are non-linear and stochastic. This means that the output of a GRN can be unpredictable, even if the inputs are known.

  • The epigenetic landscape is shaped by NonDarwinian evolution. Biased Mutations can alter the GRN, which can change the topography of the landscape. This can lead to new phenotypes and new evolutionary trajectories.

  • The epigenetic landscape model can help us to understand a variety of phenomena in post-Darwinian biology. This includes the evolution of complex traits, the origin of new species, and the role of epigenetics in human disease.

Huang's paper is an important contribution to our understanding of the epigenetic landscape and its role in NonDarwinian evolution. It provides a framework for understanding how gene regulatory networks can be used to model the epigenetic landscape, and how this model can be used to explain a variety of phenomena in post-Darwinian biology.

The article also concludes:

  • That the relationship between genotype and phenotype is not straightforward, as Neo-Darwinism assumes. Instead, the phenotype is determined by complex gene regulatory networks that are subject to noise and other factors. This means that a single genotype can give rise to a variety of phenotypes, and that changes in gene expression can occur without any changes to the genotype.

  • It shows that epigenetic variation can be inherited, which means that epigenetics can act on groups of organisms, or lineages, as well as on individual organisms. This is in contrast to the traditional Neo-Darwinian view of natural selection as acting on individuals.

  • It shows that epigenetic dynamics can play a role in rapid, saltatory evolution. This is because epigenetic changes can generate large phenotypic changes without any genetic changes.

Huang argues that these challenges to Neo-Darwinism require a new understanding of evolution that incorporates the non-linear, stochastic dynamics of gene networks. He proposes that Waddington's epigenetic landscape can provide a framework for this new understanding of evolution.

Here is a more specific explanation of each of the three challenges to Neo-Darwinism that Huang discusses in the excerpt:

1. The relationship between genotype and phenotype is not straightforward.

Neo-Darwinism traditionally assumes that the phenotype is determined by the genotype in a simple, linear way. This means that a single genotype corresponds to a single, unique phenotype. However, research on gene regulatory networks has shown that the relationship between genotype and phenotype is much more complex. Gene regulatory networks are made up of many interacting genes, and the expression of each gene is influenced by a variety of factors, including the expression of other genes, the environment, and developmental noise. As a result, a single genotype can give rise to a variety of phenotypes, and changes in gene expression can occur without any changes to the genotype.

2. Epigenetic variation can be inherited.

Neo-Darwinism traditionally assumes that natural selection acts on individuals based on their genotypes. However, research on epigenetics has shown that epigenetic variation can be inherited. Epigenetic variation is variation in gene expression that is not caused by changes to the DNA sequence. Epigenetic modifications can occur during development and can be influenced by the environment. For example, exposure to certain environmental toxins can lead to epigenetic changes that can be passed down to future generations.

Epigenetic changes can be inherited by the offspring of an organism, and these epigenetic changes can then be passed down to future generations.

3. Epigenetic dynamics can play a role in rapid, saltatory evolution.

Neo-Darwinism traditionally assumes that evolution is a gradual process driven by the accumulation of small genetic changes. However, research on epigenetics has shown that epigenetic changes can generate large phenotypic changes without any genetic changes. This means that evolution can also occur in a rapid, saltatory manner.

For example, a study of mice showed that exposure to a certain environmental toxin could lead to epigenetic changes that resulted in the offspring of the exposed mice having a different coat color than their parents. This change in coat color was inherited by the offspring of the offspring, even though there were no changes to the DNA sequence.

This study shows that epigenetic changes can play a role in rapid, saltatory evolution. By generating large phenotypic changes without any genetic changes, epigenetic changes can allow populations to adapt to new environmental conditions quickly.

Overall, Huang's paper provides a strong challenge to Neo-Darwinism and helps to pave the way for a new understanding of evolution that incorporates the role of epigenetics.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Epigenetics explains Neanderthal and Human differences better than Neo-Darwinism

Image
Article :” Unveiling the Epigenetic Landscape of Our Closest Extinct Relatives: A Tale of Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA Methylation,” by Nobel Laureate Svante Pääbo, Science (4/14) The realm of epigenetics, a relatively young branch of genetics, delves into the intricate interplay between genes and their environment, deciphering how factors beyond DNA sequence influence gene expression. DNA methylation, a key epigenetic mechanism, involves the addition of a methyl group to cytosine bases, altering gene activity. By unraveling ancient DNA methylation patterns, scientists have gained unprecedented insights into the epigenetic landscape of our long-lost relatives – the Neanderthals and Denisovans. Harnessing the power of computational methods, researchers have ingeniously reconstructed the DNA methylation maps of Neanderthals and Denisovans, capitalizing on the natural degradation processes of methylated and unmethylated cytosines in ancient DNA. By comparing these methylatio
Read more

Many Evolutionists can't "evolve" with Epigenetics

Image
M any evolutionists believe that epigenetics challenges neo-Darwinism. Neo-Darwinism is the prevailing theory of evolution, and it states that evolution is driven by natural selection, which acts on random mutations in the DNA sequence. Epigenetics, on the other hand, is the study of changes in gene expression that are not caused by changes in the DNA sequence itself. Epigenetic changes can be passed down from parents to offspring, and they can be influenced by the environment. This raises a number of challenges for neo-Darwinism. First, it challenges the view that natural selection is the only driving force in evolution. Epigenetic changes can occur without mutations in the DNA sequence, so they can provide a way for organisms to adapt to their environment more quickly than natural selection alone can explain. Second, it challenges the view that evolution is a gradual process. Epigenetic changes can be large and sudden , and they can have a significant impact on an
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se
Read more