Epigenetics guides Junk ERV without Darwin


Article: "Inhibitor of growth protein 3 epigenetically silences endogenous retroviral elements and prevents innate immune activation"

Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) are ubiquitous genetic remnants of ancient viral infections integrated into the genomes of eukaryotic cells. These ERVs, despite comprising a significant portion of the human genome, are typically silenced in adult tissues, a crucial mechanism for preventing autoimmune responses. However, the intricate mechanisms underlying ERV silencing remain largely elusive.

In this groundbreaking study, the researchers delved into the role of inhibitor of growth protein 3 (ING3), a protein known for its chromatin-binding abilities, in ERV silencing. Through a series of elegant experiments, they demonstrated that ING3 physically interacts with the promoters of several ERVs, orchestrating the recruitment of a critical enzyme known as EZH2.

EZH2, a histone methyltransferase, catalyzes the addition of a repressive mark, trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27me3), to the chromatin surrounding ERVs. This repressive mark effectively silences the ERVs, preventing their expression and potential disruption of cellular homeostasis.

To further unravel the significance of ING3 in ERV silencing, the researchers employed a genetic approach, silencing the expression of ING3 in cells. Intriguingly, the loss of ING3 resulted in a dramatic upregulation of ERV expression, accompanied by the activation of the innate immune system, the body's first line of defense against infections. This activation is likely triggered by the recognition of ERV RNA or DNA, which becomes abundant upon the loss of ING3-mediated silencing.

The collective findings of this study underscore the pivotal role of ING3 in maintaining ERV silencing and safeguarding the integrity of the innate immune system. Its ability to orchestrate the recruitment of EZH2 and establish a repressive chromatin environment at ERV loci highlights its importance in preventing autoimmune responses and maintaining cellular health.

Moreover, the identification of ING3 as a critical regulator of ERV silencing opens up exciting therapeutic avenues for combating autoimmune diseases and other disorders associated with ERV activation. By targeting ING3, it may be possible to modulate ERV expression and restore immune homeostasis, offering a novel therapeutic approach for a range of diseases.

In conclusion, this study provides compelling evidence for the crucial role of ING3 in ERV silencing and innate immune regulation, offering new insights into the mechanisms underlying ERV control and paving the way for potential therapeutic interventions.

The study poses a challenge to neo-Darwinism in several ways:

1. It suggests that there are non-random forces shaping the evolution of genomes.

Neo-Darwinism is based on the idea that evolution is driven solely by random mutations and natural selection. However, the study of ING3 and ERVs suggests that there may be other, non-random forces at work. ING3 appears to be specifically targeting ERVs for silencing, which suggests that there is some kind of  pressure to keep ERVs repressed. This pressure could be due to the fact that ERVs can be harmful to the host organism if they are activated.

2. It raises the possibility that there are epigenetic mechanisms that can be inherited from one generation to the next.

Epigenetics is the study of how gene expression is regulated without changes to the DNA sequence itself as per neo-Darwinism. The study of ING3 and ERVs suggests that there may be epigenetic mechanisms that can be passed down from parents to offspring. This is because the epigenetic silencing of ERVs by ING3 appears to be stable and long-lasting. This could have a significant impact on the evolution of genomes, as it would allow for the transmission of acquired traits from one generation to the next.

3. It suggests that there may be a role for non-coding DNA in evolution.

Neo-Darwinism is primarily concerned with the evolution of coding DNA, which is the DNA that is responsible for the production of proteins. However, the study of ING3 and ERVs suggests that non-coding DNA may also play an important role in evolution. ERVs are a type of non-coding DNA, and the study suggests that they can be selectively targeted for silencing by epigenetic mechanisms. This suggests that non-coding DNA may have a more active role in evolution than previously thought.

Overall, the study of ING3 and ERVs provides new insights into the mechanisms of evolution and raises important questions about the role of epigenetics and non-coding DNA in evolutionary processes. These findings challenge the traditional neo-Darwinian view of evolution and suggest that there may be more complex and non-random forces at work in shaping the development of life.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Sequence: The Epigenetic "Fingers" That Play the DNA Keyboard

Image
Imagine the keyboard itself is not a standard piano keyboard, but a modular synthesizer, capable of producing an almost infinite array of sounds. The DNA sequence, then, represents the fundamental building blocks of this synthesizer, the raw materials from which all sounds are generated. Epigenetics, our "fingers," manipulates these building blocks, adjusting parameters like volume, timbre, and rhythm, transforming the raw potential of the DNA sequence into a symphony of cellular functions. We can further refine the "fingers" analogy. Consider that each finger represents a distinct epigenetic mechanism: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA.  DNA methylation, for instance, might be the "index finger," capable of precisely silencing specific genes, like muting individual keys on the synthesizer. Histone modifications, the "middle finger," could represent the ability to adjust the accessibility of the DN...
Read more

Rewriting the Rules: Epigenomic Mutation Bias Challenges Randomness in Evolution

Image
This research challenges the long-held dogma that mutations occur randomly, irrespective of their consequences, by demonstrating a clear, epigenome-mediated mutation bias in Arabidopsis thaliana . The study meticulously unveils how mutation rates are not uniform across the genome but are significantly reduced in functionally constrained regions, particularly within gene bodies and essential genes. This discovery fundamentally alters our understanding of evolutionary processes, suggesting that mutation is not a purely directionless force. "Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana" This opening statement encapsulates the core finding: mutation rates are not random but reflect epigenetic pressures. The authors demonstrate that mutations are less frequent in crucial genomic regions, directly contradicting the prevailing theory of random mutation. This observation suggests an active mechanism that minimizes deleterious mutations in essentia...
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se...
Read more