An Epigenetic "Unified Evolution Theory" without Darwin


Article “Role of Environmentally induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance in evolutionary biology: Unified Evolution Theory” by Michael K. Skinner and Eric E. Nilsson (10/21) explores the concept of environmentally induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance (EE-ETI) and its potential role in shaping evolutionary processes. While the traditional understanding of evolution focuses on genetic mutations and natural selection, EE-ETI offers an additional layer of complexity by demonstrating the influence of environmental factors on gene expression and phenotypic traits across generations.

Key points from the article:

  • EE-ETI definition: EE-ETI is the transmission of environmentally induced epigenetic modifications to subsequent generations, even in the absence of continued exposure to the initial environmental trigger.

  • Epigenetic modifications: These are changes in gene expression that don't alter the underlying DNA sequence as with neodarwinism. They can include histone modifications, DNA methylation, and non-coding RNAs.

  • EE-ETI's impact on evolution:

  • Phenotypic variation: EE-ETI can induce phenotypic variability in offspring.

  • Genetic variation: It can promote genetic variation by increasing the frequency of point mutations and copy number variations.

  • Adaptation: EE-ETI can facilitate adaptation to changing environments, allowing populations to respond rapidly to environmental pressures.

  • Unified Evolution Theory: The authors propose a Unified Evolution Theory that incorporates EE-ETI. This theory suggests a multi-layered evolutionary process where genetic and epigenetic changes interact to drive adaptation.

Significance of EE-ETI:

  • Challenges neo-Darwinian view: EE-ETI offers a more nuanced understanding of evolution than the classic neo-Darwinian model. It highlights the dynamic interplay between environment, genetics, and epigenetics in shaping evolutionary trajectories.

  • Rapid adaptation: EE-ETI can explain how populations adapt to rapidly changing environments, even in the absence of significant genetic changes.

  • Transgenerational effects: Understanding EE-ETI can provide insights into the long-term consequences of environmental exposures on populations, including the possibility of transgenerational disease transmission.

Limitations and future research:

  • Research is still ongoing: While there is growing evidence for EE-ETI, further research is needed to understand the mechanisms involved and its prevalence across different species.

  • Limited data on human populations: Most research on EE-ETI has been conducted in model organisms. More studies are needed to assess its significance in human evolution and health.

Overall, the concept of EE-ETI presents a fascinating new perspective on evolutionary biology. By recognizing the influence of environmental factors on gene expression across generations, we can gain a deeper understanding of the processes that drive adaptation and shape the diversity of life on Earth.

The paper explores the significance of EETI in evolutionary biology and how it challenges the dominant theory of neo darwinism.

How does EETI challenge neo darwinism?

Neo Darwinism, the current prevailing theory of evolution, primarily relies on genetic mutations and natural selection to explain the emergence of new traits and adaptation. EETI, however, introduces a non-genetic inheritance mechanism that can potentially influence evolution in several ways:

  • Increased phenotypic variation: EETI can directly impact gene expression, leading to phenotypic variation independent of changes in DNA sequence.

  • Rapid adaptation: EETI allows organisms to rapidly adapt to environmental changes by modifying gene expression. This might be particularly advantageous in rapidly changing environments.

  • Transgenerational effects: EETI can transmit the effects of environmental exposures across generations, potentially allowing offspring to anticipate and adapt to future environments.

  • Evolutionary novelty: EETI can potentially contribute to the emergence of evolutionary novelty by generating new phenotypes that were not previously encoded in the DNA.

The presence of EETI raises several challenges to the core tenets of neo darwinism:

  • Unification of inheritance: EETI introduces a new mechanism of inheritance that operates alongside genetic inheritance. This necessitates a broader framework for understanding how both mechanisms interact and contribute to evolution.

  • Evolutionary rates: EETI may allow for faster evolutionary rates than previously thought possible, as epigenetic changes can occur much more rapidly than genetic mutations.

Unified Evolution Theory:

Skinner and Nilsson propose a "Unified Evolution Theory" that incorporates both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of inheritance. This theory acknowledges the importance of EETI in evolution and suggests that it needs to be integrated into our understanding of how species evolve.

Conclusion:

EETI represents a significant new frontier in evolutionary biology. Its potential to influence phenotypic variation, rapid adaptation, transgenerational effects, and evolutionary novelty presents a significant challenge to the traditional neo darwinian framework. Further research is needed to fully understand the role of EETI in evolution and how it interacts with genetic mechanisms. The development of a "Unified Evolution Theory" that incorporates both genetic and epigenetic inheritance is crucial for advancing our understanding of how life evolves.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Sequence: The Epigenetic "Fingers" That Play the DNA Keyboard

Image
Imagine the keyboard itself is not a standard piano keyboard, but a modular synthesizer, capable of producing an almost infinite array of sounds. The DNA sequence, then, represents the fundamental building blocks of this synthesizer, the raw materials from which all sounds are generated. Epigenetics, our "fingers," manipulates these building blocks, adjusting parameters like volume, timbre, and rhythm, transforming the raw potential of the DNA sequence into a symphony of cellular functions. We can further refine the "fingers" analogy. Consider that each finger represents a distinct epigenetic mechanism: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA.  DNA methylation, for instance, might be the "index finger," capable of precisely silencing specific genes, like muting individual keys on the synthesizer. Histone modifications, the "middle finger," could represent the ability to adjust the accessibility of the DN...
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se...
Read more

Rewriting the Rules: Epigenomic Mutation Bias Challenges Randomness in Evolution

Image
This research challenges the long-held dogma that mutations occur randomly, irrespective of their consequences, by demonstrating a clear, epigenome-mediated mutation bias in Arabidopsis thaliana . The study meticulously unveils how mutation rates are not uniform across the genome but are significantly reduced in functionally constrained regions, particularly within gene bodies and essential genes. This discovery fundamentally alters our understanding of evolutionary processes, suggesting that mutation is not a purely directionless force. "Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana" This opening statement encapsulates the core finding: mutation rates are not random but reflect epigenetic pressures. The authors demonstrate that mutations are less frequent in crucial genomic regions, directly contradicting the prevailing theory of random mutation. This observation suggests an active mechanism that minimizes deleterious mutations in essentia...
Read more