Beyond Neo Darwinism: How Epigenetics and HGT Reshape Understanding of Multilevel Selection


Beyond Neo Darwinism: How Epigenetics and HGT Reshape Understanding of Multilevel Selection

For decades, neo darwinism reigned as the dominant theory explaining evolution. It focused on natural selection acting on individual organisms and their genes, neatly explaining adaptations and speciation. However, in recent years, cracks have begun to show in this singular view. Complexities like multilevel selection, where evolutionary forces operate on levels above and below the individual, challenge the neo darwinian framework. 

Multilevel selection is a concept in evolutionary biology that proposes that selection can occur at multiple levels of organization, not just at the level of the individual organism as with neo darwinism. This means that not only do individual organisms compete for survival and reproduction, but also groups of organisms, such as populations, species, or even ecosystems. In the neo darwinian view natural selection acts on the traits of individual organisms.

This essay argues that two emerging fields, epigenetics and horizontal gene transfer (HGT), offer a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of multilevel selection, revealing its intricacies and challenging neodarwinism's limitations.

Firstly, epigenetics disrupts the strict gene-centric perspective of neo darwinism. It reveals that environmental influences can modify gene expression without altering the DNA sequence itself. These modifications, often influenced by factors like diet, stress, and social interactions, can be heritable across generations through epigenetic marks attached to the DNA.


This challenges the neo darwinian assumption that evolution solely relies on random mutations and their subsequent selection. Instead, epigenetics suggests a dynamic interplay between genes and environment, allowing for rapid shifts in phenotypes without waiting for slow genetic change.

In the context of multilevel selection, epigenetics sheds light on how group-level selection can influence individual phenotypes. For example, consider a population of birds facing a fluctuating food supply. During times of plenty, epigenetic marks might favor increased growth and reproduction, benefiting the group by producing more offspring. However, during scarcity, different marks might prioritize survival, even if it means suppressing individual reproduction. This epigenetic plasticity allows populations to adapt to changing environments without necessarily requiring genetic change in every individual.

Secondly, HGT throws a wrench into the neo darwinian focus on vertical inheritance from parent to offspring. It reveals that genes can jump across species barriers, directly from one organism to another, bypassing traditional reproductive pathways. This horizontal flow of genetic material can rapidly introduce new adaptations and accelerate evolutionary change within and between populations. In multilevel selection, HGT offers a mechanism for the spread of beneficial traits across groups. Imagine a community of microbes where one species develops a resistance to a potent antibiotic. Through HGT, this resistance gene can quickly spread to other species within the community, boosting their collective survival in the face of the antibiotic threat. As well, the human gut microbiome can transfer this to us.

HGT also challenges the neo darwinian emphasis on individual fitness. Because genes can benefit organisms beyond their own lineage, HGT introduces the concept of group-level selection in a more tangible way. A gene that enhances the survival of its host's community, even if it slightly reduces the host's individual fitness, might still be favored through HGT because it increases the overall abundance of the gene pool. This challenges the strict individual-centric view of neo darwinism and opens the door for a more nuanced understanding of development  beyond the single organism.

Epigenetics and HGT offer powerful tools for understanding multilevel selection, revealing its complexities and pushing beyond the limitations of neo darwinism. Epigenetics highlights the dynamic interplay between genes and environment, allowing for rapid adaptations within groups. HGT, on the other hand, disrupts the linear view of genetic inheritance, allowing for the rapid spread of beneficial traits across communities and challenging the primacy of individual fitness. By integrating these insights, we gain a richer understanding of evolution as a multi-layered process, where selection operates on various levels, shaping not just individuals but also populations and ecosystems. This understanding holds immense potential for diverse fields, from medicine and biotechnology to conservation and social sciences, offering a more complete picture of the evolutionary tapestry that weaves the diversity of life on Earth.

Multilevel Selection: A Duet of Epigenetics and Horizontal Gene Transfer beyond neo darwinism

Evolution operates at various scales, from the individual gene to the entire ecosystem. But how do these levels "talk" to each other shaping the evolutionary trajectory? Multilevel selection theory attempts to bridge this gap, and recent discoveries in epigenetics and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) offer compelling evidence for its intricate workings.

Epigenetics, the study of heritable changes that don't alter the DNA sequence itself, provides a dynamic layer of control. Environmental cues can trigger modifications like DNA methylation and histone acetylation, impacting gene expression. Imagine a group of organisms facing a changing food source. Those with epigenetically primed genes for exploiting the new resource gain a reproductive advantage, potentially altering the gene pool of their offspring. This epigenetic shift can then reverberate across generations, impacting the selection landscape for the entire population. This multilevel dance between individual adaptation and epigenetic inheritance exemplifies how lower levels can influence selection at higher levels.

HGT, the transfer of genetic material between distantly related organisms, adds another layer of complexity. Imagine bacteria adapting to an antibiotic. One bacterium acquires a resistance gene through HGT, granting it a survival advantage. This can trigger a "wave of selection" within the population, as the resistance gene spreads horizontally, rapidly adapting the entire community to the antibiotic pressure. Here, selection operates at both the individual and group levels, with HGT acting as a conduit for rapid adaptation across the population.

These findings have profound philosophical implications. They challenge the once-dominant "gene-centric" view of evolution, highlighting the interplay between different levels of selection and the importance of environmental context. They suggest that evolution is not simply a struggle for individual survival, but also a collaborative effort towards group adaptation and resilience. This has raised new questions about the nature of inheritance, the units of selection, and the very definition of what constitutes an "individual" in complex biological systems.

Ongoing debates and challenges remain. Critics argue that multilevel selection can be difficult to empirically test, with concerns about attributing selection pressures to the appropriate level. Additionally, disentangling the relative contributions of epigenetics and HGT to multilevel selection remains a complex task.

Despite these challenges, the discoveries in epigenetics and HGT have breathed new life into multilevel selection theory. They offer a fascinating glimpse into the intricate tapestry of evolution, where different levels interweave and collaborate to shape the destinies of individuals, populations, and entire ecosystems. As we move past neo darwinism to unravel the secrets of these hidden actors, the story of evolution promises to become even more captivating and profound.

Ref:

The role of multilevel selection in host microbiome evolution

Beyond the modern synthesis: A framework for a more inclusive biological synthesis


Google Scholar

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Epigenetics explains Neanderthal and Human differences better than Neo-Darwinism

Many Evolutionists can't "evolve" with Epigenetics

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?