# el Unified Evolution Theory" :Challenging the Weismann Barrier and Neo-Darwinian Theory

Explanation of the article "Role of environmentally induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance in evolutionary biology: Unified Evolution Theory" by Skinner et al. (2021):

Challenging the Weismann Barrier and Neo-Darwinian Theory

The traditional view of inheritance, shaped by August Weismann's germ-plasm theory, proposes a clear separation between germline cells (sperm and egg) and somatic cells (body cells). 


This separation, known as the Weismann barrier, prevents the inheritance of acquired traits – characteristics developed by an organism during its lifetime due to environmental influences.

Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection relies heavily on the idea that heritable traits arise from genetic mutations. These mutations create variations in phenotypes, the observable characteristics of an organism. Natural selection then favors individuals with traits best suited to their environment, leading to gradual adaptation over generations.

The concept of environmentally induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance (ETI) challenges this traditional view. ETI proposes that environmental factors can induce epigenetic modifications – changes in gene expression that don't alter the DNA sequence itself – in germline cells. These modifications can then be passed down to future generations, potentially influencing their phenotypes.

Introducing Epigenetics and Its Potential Impact

Epigenetics refers to the study of heritable changes in gene expression that occur without alterations in the DNA sequence. These changes can be mediated by various mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, which influence how tightly DNA is packaged and how accessible genes are to cellular machinery.

The authors argue that ETI can introduce phenotypic variation in offspring, influencing how genes are expressed and potentially leading to the development of new traits. This epigenetic phenotypic variation can accelerating adaptation to environmental changes.

Exploring the Implications of ETI

The article explores the potential ramifications of ETI for various evolutionary phenomena. Here are some key areas of exploration:

  • Origin of complex traits: Complex traits, such as behavior and disease susceptibility, are often influenced by multiple genes. ETI could provide a mechanism for coordinating the expression of these genes across generations, facilitating the evolution of complex traits.

  • Developmental plasticity: The ability of an organism to modify its development in response to environmental cues is known as developmental plasticity. ETI could play a role in this process by creating a 'memory' of past environmental conditions that can influence future generations' development.

The Need for Further Research

The field of ETI is still relatively young, and much remains unknown about the precise mechanisms, limitations, and overall evolutionary significance of this phenomenon. The authors emphasize the need for further research to:

  • Elucidate the specific environmental factors that can induce ETI in different species.

  • Understand how epigenetic marks are transmitted across generations and how they influence gene expression in offspring.

  • Explore the prevalence and persistence of ETI in natural populations.

  • Investigate the role of ETI in facilitating adaptation and speciation.

By delving deeper into ETI, researchers can gain a richer understanding of how organisms respond and adapt to their environments. This knowledge could potentially lead to a more unified theory of evolution that integrates the effects of genetics, environment, and epigenetic inheritance.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Epigenetics explains Neanderthal and Human differences better than Neo-Darwinism

Image
Article :” Unveiling the Epigenetic Landscape of Our Closest Extinct Relatives: A Tale of Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA Methylation,” by Nobel Laureate Svante Pääbo, Science (4/14) The realm of epigenetics, a relatively young branch of genetics, delves into the intricate interplay between genes and their environment, deciphering how factors beyond DNA sequence influence gene expression. DNA methylation, a key epigenetic mechanism, involves the addition of a methyl group to cytosine bases, altering gene activity. By unraveling ancient DNA methylation patterns, scientists have gained unprecedented insights into the epigenetic landscape of our long-lost relatives – the Neanderthals and Denisovans. Harnessing the power of computational methods, researchers have ingeniously reconstructed the DNA methylation maps of Neanderthals and Denisovans, capitalizing on the natural degradation processes of methylated and unmethylated cytosines in ancient DNA. By comparing these methylatio
Read more

Many Evolutionists can't "evolve" with Epigenetics

Image
M any evolutionists believe that epigenetics challenges neo-Darwinism. Neo-Darwinism is the prevailing theory of evolution, and it states that evolution is driven by natural selection, which acts on random mutations in the DNA sequence. Epigenetics, on the other hand, is the study of changes in gene expression that are not caused by changes in the DNA sequence itself. Epigenetic changes can be passed down from parents to offspring, and they can be influenced by the environment. This raises a number of challenges for neo-Darwinism. First, it challenges the view that natural selection is the only driving force in evolution. Epigenetic changes can occur without mutations in the DNA sequence, so they can provide a way for organisms to adapt to their environment more quickly than natural selection alone can explain. Second, it challenges the view that evolution is a gradual process. Epigenetic changes can be large and sudden , and they can have a significant impact on an
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se
Read more