Blood Clotting challenges NeoDarwinism


The blood clotting mechanism is a complex process that involves many different proteins and enzymes. It is essential for preventing excessive bleeding after an injury. However, it can also lead to dangerous blood clots that can block blood vessels and cause strokes and heart attacks.

Neo-Darwinism is the modern theory of evolution, which is based on the ideas of Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace. It states that evolution is driven by natural selection, which is the process by which organisms with favorable traits are more likely to survive and reproduce.

Many scientists have argued that the blood clotting mechanism is a challenge to Neo-Darwinism because it is so complex. They argue that it is unlikely that such a complex system could have evolved through natural selection alone.

In addition, scientists have shown that the blood clotting system can be disrupted by mutations in the genes that encode the proteins involved in blood clotting. This suggests that the blood clotting system is vulnerable to mutations, so how can random mutations overcome the deleterious ones?

The blood clotting mechanism is a complex system of proteins and enzymes that work together to stop bleeding. It is essential for life, but how can it occur by gradual steps as with NeoDarwinism as it has to be complete for life to begin with. 

Here are 10 ways that the blood clotting mechanism challenges Neo-Darwinism:

  1. It is incredibly complex, with over a dozen different proteins and enzymes involved.

  2. It is highly coordinated, with all of the different components working together in precise sequence.

  3. It is very efficient, with even a small amount of damage to a blood vessel being able to trigger the clotting cascade.

  4. It is very specific, with different clotting factors being activated by different types of damage.

  5. It is highly regulated, with a number of different feedback mechanisms in place to prevent excessive clotting.

  6. It is essential for life, but it can also be a major cause of death if it goes wrong.

  7. It is very susceptible to mutations, which can lead to a variety of bleeding disorders.

  8. It is very difficult to explain how such a complex and well-coordinated system could have arisen through a series of random mutations and natural selection.

  9. The blood clotting mechanism is very similar in all vertebrates, which suggests that it is a very ancient trait. This is difficult to explain if Neo-Darwinism is correct, as it would require that the same complex system evolved independently many times.

  10. The blood clotting mechanism is not just a simple defense against injury. It also plays a role in a number of other important bodily functions, such as wound healing and tissue repair. This suggests that it is a product of intelligent design rather than random chance.

Neo-Darwinism is a waning theory of evolution and has a number of problems, including the inability to explain the complexity of the blood clotting mechanism.  Neo-Darwinism falls short in explaining the diversity and complexity of life.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Sequence: The Epigenetic "Fingers" That Play the DNA Keyboard

Image
Imagine the keyboard itself is not a standard piano keyboard, but a modular synthesizer, capable of producing an almost infinite array of sounds. The DNA sequence, then, represents the fundamental building blocks of this synthesizer, the raw materials from which all sounds are generated. Epigenetics, our "fingers," manipulates these building blocks, adjusting parameters like volume, timbre, and rhythm, transforming the raw potential of the DNA sequence into a symphony of cellular functions. We can further refine the "fingers" analogy. Consider that each finger represents a distinct epigenetic mechanism: DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA.  DNA methylation, for instance, might be the "index finger," capable of precisely silencing specific genes, like muting individual keys on the synthesizer. Histone modifications, the "middle finger," could represent the ability to adjust the accessibility of the DN...
Read more

Rewriting the Rules: Epigenomic Mutation Bias Challenges Randomness in Evolution

Image
This research challenges the long-held dogma that mutations occur randomly, irrespective of their consequences, by demonstrating a clear, epigenome-mediated mutation bias in Arabidopsis thaliana . The study meticulously unveils how mutation rates are not uniform across the genome but are significantly reduced in functionally constrained regions, particularly within gene bodies and essential genes. This discovery fundamentally alters our understanding of evolutionary processes, suggesting that mutation is not a purely directionless force. "Mutation bias reflects natural selection in Arabidopsis thaliana" This opening statement encapsulates the core finding: mutation rates are not random but reflect epigenetic pressures. The authors demonstrate that mutations are less frequent in crucial genomic regions, directly contradicting the prevailing theory of random mutation. This observation suggests an active mechanism that minimizes deleterious mutations in essentia...
Read more

Why are Christian philosophers running towards Darwin while biologists are "running" away?

Image
As nature reveals the strength of epigenetics and the weakness of Neo-Darwinism, biologists are “running” away from the long-standing accepted theory. In The Federalist , April 2019, Benjamin Dierker reviews “Why one-third of biologists now question Darwinism”: "Current estimates are that approximately one-third of professional academic biologists who do not believe in intelligent design find Darwin’s Theory inadequate to describe all of the complexity in biology.” Dierker continues, “The important note is that these are not ideologues or religious zealots, nor do they propose a god or biblical solution.  Rather, they find problems in the lack of explanatory power of Darwin’s theory in light of modern understanding of mutation, variation, DNA sequencing and more. These expressions of doubt do not reject naturalism or evolution per se, but the rigor of the Neo-Darwinian model for explaining the development of life.” For 40 years, scientists calculated natural se...
Read more